Skip to content
opsnite
Use cases

Built for teams where evidence is non-negotiable.

Three kinds of team we built for. The pattern under the names is the same: heavy audit work, real consequences for a miss, and tools that do not share data.

Life sciences & healthcare

For teams handling PHI and regulated product data: HIPAA, HITECH, 21 CFR Part 11/211/820, GAMP 5, ISO 27001 and the EU device rules, in one catalog.

The pain

Audits eat quarters. Vendor BAAs, validation evidence and the control set live in three different systems. Every customer security review starts with a search.

How opsnite fits
  • ▸Catalog frameworks for HIPAA, HITECH, 21 CFR Part 11, 211 and 820, GAMP 5, IEC 62304, EU MDR and EU IVDR, ISO 27001 and ISO 9001
  • ▸Agreements linked to the vendor record, with versions, reviews and AI obligation extraction
  • ▸Validation evidence stored against the controls it supports
  • ▸Inbound security questionnaires answered from your own control state
48 frameworks in the catalogAgreements linked to vendorsEvidence on controls
See how the product itself is verified →
opsnite · life-scienceslive
Life sciences & healthcare use case in opsnite

Multi-framework view. HIPAA, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 in one tenant.

B2B SaaS

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 for engineering-led teams, with exposure scanning and customer security reviews on the same data.

The pain

Compliance turns into a fire drill before each audit. Engineers dislike questionnaires. Scanner output lives somewhere the audit tool never sees.

How opsnite fits
  • ▸Evidence from AWS (Config, Security Hub, GuardDuty, IAM access data), Microsoft Entra ID and Intune, and Jira
  • ▸prowler for cloud posture, trivy for images and IaC, kube-bench for clusters, run from one scan plan
  • ▸Findings mapped to the controls and framework requirements they affect
  • ▸Vendor discovery from spend data and subprocessor tracking
13 scan enginesEPSS + KEV on every findingFindings mapped to controls
See the scan engines and the risk graph →
opsnite · saaslive
B2B SaaS use case in opsnite

Compliance posture on a demo tenant.

Financial services

Audit trails that hold up to review, vendor records with the agreements behind them, and catalog frameworks for NYDFS 500, FFIEC, GLBA, SOX and DORA.

The pain

Exams need binders of evidence. Fourth-party risk is a guess. Contract obligations live in Word files nobody reopens after signing.

How opsnite fits
  • ▸Catalog frameworks for NYDFS 500, FFIEC CAT, GLBA, SOX and DORA
  • ▸Subprocessor tracking on each vendor record
  • ▸Obligations extracted from agreements and kept on the contract record
  • ▸Hash-chained audit events, so tampering with the trail is detectable
NYDFS 500 in the catalogSubprocessor trackingHash-chained audit log
See the modules →
opsnite · finservlive
Financial services use case in opsnite

Vendor register on a demo tenant.

Industry not listed?

The platform is industry-agnostic; these three are where we started. Send us your context and we’ll tell you straight whether opsnite fits, and where it does not yet.