The why behind opsnite.
Operations and compliance are the same job, run by different teams, on different tools, with different data. We are fixing that.
We started opsnite after watching the same scene play out at company after company. The CISO buys a GRC tool. The compliance lead buys a vendor risk tool. Procurement buys a CLM. The director of audit buys an audit platform. Engineering buys a vulnerability aggregator. Twelve months later, none of them talk to each other and the auditor is asking the same question for the third year in a row.
- CISO
- → GRC tool
- Compliance lead
- → vendor risk tool
- Procurement
- → CLM
- Director of audit
- → audit platform
- Engineering
- → vulnerability aggregator
- 12 months later
- → 0 connections
Every one of those tools is solving a real problem. None of them is solving the actual problem, which is that operations and compliance are the same job. A control is also a vendor obligation. A vulnerability is also a finding. A contract is also a risk register entry. The work happens at the intersections; the tools live in the silos.
opsnite starts at the intersections. Controls, risks, vendors, contracts, findings and assets are rows in one Postgres schema, 207 data models with foreign keys between them. The modules are how different teams find their workflow inside the same data, not separate products synced overnight.
The principles.
Honest by default
We tell you when our product is the wrong fit. We tell you what is shipped, what is built but untested against a live system, and what is roadmap. We would rather lose a deal than win one we expect to regret.
One graph or nothing
We will not ship a module that does not connect to the rest. The integration is the product. If we cannot make it connect, we wait until we can.
Engineers are customers
Compliance work that engineers refuse to do does not get done. Every workflow that touches engineering is designed to be done in their tools, not ours.
Audits are not adversarial
Auditors do their job better when auditees give them clean evidence. The platform is built to make both sides faster, not to hide things.
Pre-launch, and saying so.
opsnite is pre-launch. The product is built and tested: the exposure stack passed verification on a demo tenant in May 2026 (13 engines, 9 pass, 0 fail, 4 skipped because they need a service you run), and per-tenant identity, SSO and fleet patching shipped in June. There are no paying customers yet and no case studies, so you will not find logos here.
Each customer gets a single-tenant deployment on AWS: its own containers, its own Postgres database, its own SSO. We are looking for design partners at regulated companies who want to run it on real work and tell us where it breaks. The verification page lists what has been tested and what has not.
Want to be a design partner?
A small number of teams get early access, hands-on onboarding from the people who wrote the code, and a real say in what ships next.